Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries — Collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment
ISO 14224 provides standardized equipment taxonomy and reliability, failure, and maintenance data requirements for covered industries.
What the authority record establishes
ISO 14224 provides standardized equipment taxonomy and reliability, failure, and maintenance data requirements for covered industries.
Voluntary unless adopted through contract, policy, law, or another authority
The exact official title, issuing body, jurisdiction, version or application record, and linked source define the scope of this page. Readers should not transfer the authority's status to a commercial product or infer transaction-, patient-, system-, site-, or organization-specific applicability from this summary.
Why it matters to this market
It gives industrial buyers a disciplined basis for equipment identity, failure mode, cause, consequence, maintenance action, resource, downtime, and data-quality fields.
Affected operating stages
- Equipment Taxonomy
- Failure Data
- Maintenance Data
- Quality Control
- Exchange
- Analysis Preparation
Capabilities to examine
Asset Registry And Hierarchy
Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for asset registry and hierarchy.
Failure Codes And Maintenance History
Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for failure codes and maintenance history.
Downtime And Availability Analysis
Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for downtime and availability analysis.
Maintenance Cost And Budget Analysis
Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for maintenance cost and budget analysis.
Asset Criticality And Risk Ranking
Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for asset criticality and risk ranking.
Reliability-Centered Maintenance And Strategy
Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for reliability-centered maintenance and strategy.
Document Control And Audit Trails
Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for document control and audit trails.
API And Data Export
Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for API and data export.
Affected buyer audiences
- oil and gas reliability
- maintenance systems
- data governance
- operators and contractors
Implementation questions
- Which entities, products, populations, transactions, systems, sites, or jurisdictions are actually within scope?
- What is binding, what is guidance, and what is a technical or consensus standard?
- Which publication, adoption, effective, application, transition, and enforcement dates differ?
- Who owns legal, clinical, quality, regulatory, policy, or operational interpretation?
- How will a source revision affect open work and historical decisions?
Interpretation boundary
The standard is industry-specific and does not prescribe analysis methods, determine failure cause, or validate a product's data quality.